more quick actions
minimize quick actions
Hello all,
did someone already tried to communicate with PcVue OPC Server in DCOM with MAtrikon Tunneler.
thanks
Posted : 19/06/2014 3:39 pm
Hello Romain,
I am not sure about understanding the problem.
The aim of using Matrikon Tunneller is having the Tunneller locally.
I have already made a platform with the demo version (30 days) with 2 VM and it was not as easy as expected.
What I can say is DCOMCNFG can be mandatory to configure, depending on the OPC server because the Tunneller is run as service.
BR
Edouard
Posted : 19/06/2014 4:44 pm
Hi Romain
You can ask to Manu NAU about Philip Morris project. I don't know if PcVue runs as client or server.
Posted : 19/06/2014 5:05 pm
Hi Romain,
I did it long time ago (PcVue 9 I think) and it worked at first shot.
You must have 2 tunnelers, one on each side therefore no DCOM anymore (that's the Tuneller's purpose actually!).
The only bad point I had at that time was the performances. If data flow between the server and client is big then Tuneller was like a bottleneck. But I guess Matrikon improved this product since that time...
Posted : 20/06/2014 6:59 am
Hello Romain,
You can refer to KB650 for more details about how to use Tunneller.
Posted : 20/06/2014 7:18 am
Hello,
PcVue China has tested the MAtrikon&Kepware Tunneler and redundancy. Below is the info and reports.
I met some problem on the Kepware tunneling, and their engineer said it's a bug.No more info from them since then.
Posted : 20/06/2014 7:26 am
Thank you.
Posted : 20/06/2014 1:03 pm